4.7 Article

Application of a heterogeneous physical model for the adsorption of Cd2+, Ni2+, Zn2+ and Cu2+ ions on flamboyant pods functionalized with citric acid

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 417, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127975

Keywords

Adsorption; Biomass; Heavy metals; Heterogeneous physical model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A heterogeneous physical model with two binding sites successfully explained the adsorption of Cd2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, and Cu2+ ions on flamboyant pods functionalized with citric acid, highlighting the crucial roles of specific functional groups in the adsorbent. Adsorption was more effective at high temperatures, suggesting an endothermic process associated with physisorption, making it suitable for treating water pollution by heavy metal ions.
A heterogeneous physical model with two bindings sites (HPMTBS) was successfully used to explain the adsorption of Cd2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, and Cu2+ ions on flamboyant pods functionalized with citric acid. Experimental results and statistical physics modeling showed that carboxylic and phenolic functionalities of this adsorbent played a relevant role for the adsorption of Cd2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, and Cu2+ ions. Calculations performed with HPMTBS suggested that the removal of these cations was a multi-ionic adsorption process at tested operating conditions. This adsorbent was more effective to remove Cd2+, Ni2+, Zn2+ and Cu2+ ions at high solution temperatures thus indicating an endothermic process with adsorption energies ranging from 20.3 to 29.5 kJ/mol, which were associated to physisorption. The total adsorption capacities varied from 0.10 to 0.32, 0.28 to 0.39, 0.19 to 0.25 and 0.20 to 0.31 mmol/g for Cd2+, Ni2+, Zn2+ and Cu2+, respectively. This difference in adsorption capacities could be attributed to the ionic radius of tested adsorbates. This functionalized biomass can be considered as an alternative adsorbent for facing water pollution by heavy metal ions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available