4.4 Review

The importance of co-delivery of nanoparticle-siRNA and anticancer agents in cancer therapy

Journal

CHEMICAL BIOLOGY & DRUG DESIGN
Volume 97, Issue 4, Pages 997-1015

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.13824

Keywords

anticancer agents; drug delivery; gene therapy; nanomedicine; siRNA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide, with single-drug therapy having limitations due to low efficacy, leading to the trend of combination therapy. siRNA is a highly attractive method for suppressing tumor growth, but faces challenges in efficient delivery. Overcoming challenges in successful RNA interference and utilizing suitable delivery systems such as nanoparticles are crucial for targeting therapy.
According to global statistics, cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Because of the heterogeneity of cancer, single-drug therapy has many limitations due to low efficacy. Therefore, combination therapy with two or more therapeutic agents is being arisen. One of the most important approaches in cancer therapy is the shot down of key genes involved in apoptotic processes and cell cycle. In this regard, siRNA is a good candidate, a highly attractive method to suppressing tumor growth and invasion. Combination therapy with siRNAs and chemotherapeutic agents can overcome the multidrug resistance and increase apoptosis. The efficient delivery of siRNA to the target cell/tissue/organ has been a challenge. To overcome these challenges, the presence of suitable delivery systems by using nanoparticles is interesting. In this review, we discuss the current challenges for successful RNA interference. Also, we suggested proper a strategy for delivering siRNA that can be useful in targeting therapy. Finally, the combination of a variety of anticancer drugs and siRNA through acceptable delivery systems and their effects on cell cycle and apoptosis will be evaluated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available