4.6 Review

Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Ionic Liquid System: Promising Ideal Catalysts for the Fixation of CO2 into Cyclic Carbonates

Journal

CHEMCATCHEM
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages 1848-1866

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.202001572

Keywords

CO2 fixation; cyclic carbonates; homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis; ionic liquid catalysts; porous materials; supported ionic liquid

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFA0710202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21978043, U1662130]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews recent literature on the use of ionic liquid catalysts to fix carbon dioxide into cyclic carbonates, discusses the progress of current research and the problems that need to be addressed, and summarizes the basic principles for designing ionic liquid catalysts for the reaction in question as well as highlighting directions for future research.
Massive emissions of CO2 have caused environmental problems all over the world. The fixation of CO2 into cyclic carbonates is regarded as an effective way of capturing and utilizing CO2. Ionic liquid catalysts (ILCs) have received great attention and been employed for catalyzing the above reaction in recent years due to their unique properties. However, there are still a few problems requiring solutions in order to finally find the ideal catalyst. Herein, we reviewed a number of recent related literature. The progresses of both homogeneous and heterogeneous ILCs were discussed to find out where we are and which directions to work on. The effects of cations and anions of ionic liquids (ILs), functional groups, reaction phase states, structures of supports, preparation methods of supported ionic liquids (SILs), and interactions between the ILs and supports were investigated systematically. Accordingly, basic principles of designing ILCs for the title reaction are summarized and directions of future investigations are highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available