4.4 Review

Optical Biosensors for Virus Detection: Prospects for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19

Journal

CHEMBIOCHEM
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages 1176-1189

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.202000744

Keywords

colorimetry; COVID-19; fluorescence; optical biosensors; plasmons; virus detection

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1554954, ECCS-1608389]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of optical techniques for viral detection, with different phenomena providing various detection methods with advantages and disadvantages. While some methods require advanced instrumentation, fluorescence and colorimetry show promise for point-of-care diagnostics due to their low cost and ease of use.
The recent pandemic of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused huge worldwide disruption due to the lack of available testing locations and equipment. The use of optical techniques for viral detection has flourished in the past 15 years, providing more reliable, inexpensive, and accurate detection methods. In the current minireview, optical phenomena including fluorescence, surface plasmons, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), and colorimetry are discussed in the context of detecting virus pathogens. The sensitivity of a viral detection method can be dramatically improved by using materials that exhibit surface plasmons or SERS, but often this requires advanced instrumentation for detection. Although fluorescence and colorimetry lack high sensitivity, they show promise as point-of-care diagnostics because of their relatively less complicated instrumentation, ease of use, lower costs, and the fact that they do not require nucleic acid amplification. The advantages and disadvantages of each optical detection method are presented, and prospects for applying optical biosensors in COVID-19 detection are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available