4.7 Article

Exploring the evolution of pores in HIPed Y2O3 transparent ceramics

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 47, Issue 8, Pages 11637-11643

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.01.002

Keywords

Densification; Pore growth; Hot isostatic pressing

Funding

  1. A*Star of Singapore [A1883C0003]
  2. Ministry of Education (MOE) , Singapore [2018T1001145]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology Taiwan [MOST 1092221E006235MY3]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61875078, 51702135]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20191002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that in the fabrication of Y2O3 transparent ceramics, a certain amount of nano-sized pores still existed after hot isostatic pressing (HIP), requiring air annealing for bleaching. Different annealing temperatures affected transparency, with high temperatures causing pore growth and loss of transparency, along with significant expansion in pore and sample dimensions.
Y2O3 transparent ceramics were fabricated by using vacuum sintering followed by hot isostatic pressing (HIPing). After HIP, large pores were eliminated, but a certain amount of nano-sized pores survived. Air annealing is required to bleach the as-HIPed ceramics. However, the annealing temperatures affected the transparency by affecting the evolution of the residual nano-pores. A high annealing temperature of >= 1600 degrees C resulted in obvious pore growth and loss of transparency of the samples. Pressure-less thermal expansion and shrinkage behaviors of the as-HIPed Y2O3 ceramics were studied in detail. The high annealing temperature (1600 degrees C) could lead to obvious swelling of both the pore sizes and the dimensions of the samples. It implies that the swelling of pores is not only from the diffusion and aggregation of the existing smaller pores, but may also from the thermal expansion of the high-pressure precipitated insoluble gas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available