4.7 Article

Ultra-low Dose Aerosol Infection of Mice with Mycobacterium tuberculosis More Closely Models Human Tuberculosis

Journal

CELL HOST & MICROBE
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 68-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.10.003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [U19AI135976, 75N93019C00070, R01AI134713, R21AI142667]
  2. NCDIR [P41 GM109824, T32HD007233-35]
  3. Parker B. Francis Fellowship
  4. Washington Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study successfully developed a tuberculosis model in mice that more closely resembles human disease by infecting them with an ultra-low dose of bacteria, resulting in highly heterogeneous bacterial burdens and granulomas similar to those in humans. By identifying blood RNA signatures, it was possible to predict infection outcomes in mice and infer the risk of progression to active tuberculosis in humans.
Tuberculosis (TB) is a heterogeneous disease manifesting in a subset of individuals infected with aerosolized Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). Unlike human TB, murine infection results in uniformly high lung bacterial burdens and poorly organized granulomas. To develop a TB model that more closely resembles human disease, we infected mice with an ultra-low dose (ULD) of between 1-3 founding bacteria, reflecting a physiologic inoculum. ULD-infected mice exhibited highly heterogeneous bacterial burdens, well-circumscribed granulomas that shared features with human granulomas, and prolonged Mtb containment with unilateral pulmonary infection in some mice. We identified blood RNA signatures in mice infected with an ULD or a conventional Mtb dose (50-100 CFU) that correlated with lung bacterial burdens and predicted Mtb infection outcomes across species, including risk of progression to active TB in humans. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of the murine TB model and show that ULD infection recapitulates key features of human TB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available