4.8 Article

A circuit logic for sexually shared and dimorphic aggressive behaviors in Drosophila

Journal

CELL
Volume 184, Issue 2, Pages 507-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.048

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDA [R01-DA031389]
  2. BBSRC [BB/N000803/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This passage discusses the function and gender differences of three cell types that regulate aggression in Drosophila, as well as how these circuits affect the aggressive behaviors of male and female flies from the appetitive phase to the consummatory phase. The strength of the connection between monomorphic and dimorphic behaviors is increased by social isolation, indicating a possible locus for isolation-dependent enhancement of aggression.
Aggression involves both sexually monomorphic and dimorphic actions. How the brain implements these two types of actions is poorly understood. We have identified three cell types that regulate aggression in Drosophila: one type is sexually shared, and the other two are sex specific. Shared common aggression-promoting (CAP) neurons mediate aggressive approach in both sexes, whereas functionally downstream dimorphic but homologous cell types, called male-specific aggression-promoting (MAP) neurons in males and fpC1 in females, control dimorphic attack. These symmetric circuits underlie the divergence of male and female aggressive behaviors, from their monomorphic appetitive/motivational to their dimorphic consummatory phases. The strength of the monomorphic -> dimorphic functional connection is increased by social isolation in both sexes, suggesting that it may be a locus for isolation-dependent enhancement of aggression. Together, these findings reveal a circuit logic for the neural control of behaviors that include both sexually monomorphic and dimorphic actions, which may generalize to other organisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available