4.8 Article

Tau PTM Profiles Identify Patient Heterogeneity and Stages of Alzheimer's Disease

Journal

CELL
Volume 183, Issue 6, Pages 1699-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.029

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Tau Consortium (TC)
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM112007, RC4GM096319, R01 NS066973]
  3. NINDS/NIMH
  4. National Multiple Sclerosis Society
  5. US Department of Veterans Affairs
  6. University of Maryland Brain and Tissue Bank
  7. University of Miami Brain Endowment Bank [HHS-NIH-NIDA(MH)-12-265]
  8. University of Miami Brain Endowment Bank (Francis and Norris McGowan Endowment Fund)
  9. Harvard Brain Tissue Resource Center [HHSN-2712013-00030C]
  10. Neurodegenerative Disease Brain Bank at UCSF (TC, Consortium for FTD Research)
  11. Neurodegenerative Disease Brain Bank at UCSF (NIA) [AG023501, AG19724]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To elucidate the role of Tau isoforms and post-translational modification (PTM) stoichiometry in Alzheimer's disease (AD), we generated a high-resolution quantitative proteomics map of 95 PTMs on multiple isoforms of Tau isolated from postmortem human tissue from 49 AD and 42 control subjects. Although Tau PTM maps reveal heterogeneity across subjects, a subset of PTMs display high occupancy and frequency for AD, suggesting importance in disease. Unsupervised analyses indicate that PTMs occur in an ordered manner. leading to Tau aggregation. The processive addition and minimal set of PTMs associated with seeding activity was further defined by analysis of size-fractionated Tau. To summarize, features in the Tau protein critical for disease intervention at different stages of disease are identified, including enrichment of 0N and 4R isoforms, underrepresentation of the C terminus, an increase in negative charge in the proline-rich region (PRR), and a decrease in positive charge in the microtubule binding domain (MBD).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available