4.7 Article

Electronic and optical properties of the SnO2/CsPbI3 interface: Using first principles calculations

Journal

CATALYSIS TODAY
Volume 374, Issue -, Pages 208-213

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2020.12.034

Keywords

First principles calculations; SnO2 (110) /CsPbI3 interface; Electronic properties; Optical properties

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11764027, 51674130]
  2. Scientific research projects of higher education in Gansu Province [2018A-126]
  3. Research Team Support Program of Lanzhou Institute of Technology [2018KW-11, 2020KJ-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The crystal structure and photoelectric properties of the CsPbI3/SnO2 interface were studied at the atomic and electronic levels using first principles calculations. Electronic band structure calculations revealed a band gap of about 1.48 eV for cubic CsPbI3, while the SnO2/CsPbI3 interface exhibited new electronic density of states near the Fermi level due to the contribution of specific orbitals. Static dielectric constant of crystal CsPbI3 was determined to be 6.22 with an optical band gap of approximately 1.48 eV.
Crystal structure and photoelectric properties of the light absorbing layer (CsPbI3)/electron transporting layer (SnO2) heterogeneous interface were studied at the atomic and electronic levels by using the first principles calculations. The calculation of electronic band structure indicates that band gap of the cubic CsPbI3 is about 1.48 eV. The lattice mismatch of SnO2 (110)/CsPbI3 (100) interface is 4.45 % and the interface binding energy is -2.86 J/m(2). Due to the contribution of I-5p, Pb-6p, Pb-6s, and O-2p orbitals with the CsPbI3 (100) layer1 and SnO2 (110) layer1, the SnO2 (110)/CsPbI3 (100) interface exhibits some new electronic density of states nearby the Fermi level. The static dielectric constant of crystal CsPbI3 is 6.22, and its optical band gap is also approximate 1.48 eV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available