4.6 Article

SNAIL regulates gastric carcinogenesis through CCN3 and NEFL

Journal

CARCINOGENESIS
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 190-201

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgaa133

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Sumitomo Danippon Pharma Co., Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In cancer cells, there are specific cell populations that exhibit stem cell-like traits, high CD44 expression, and properties of cancer stem cells (CSCs) such as chemoresistance, tumorigenicity, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Disrupting the SNAIL/CCN3/NEFL axis may be effective in inhibiting gastric cancer development.
Among cancer cells, there are specific cell populations of whose activities are comparable to those of stem cells in normal tissues, and for whom the levels of cell dedifferentiation are reported to correlate with poor prognosis. Information concerning the mechanisms that modulate the sternness like traits of cancer cells is limited. Therefore, we examined five gastric cancer cell lines and isolated gastric oncospheres from three gastric cancer cell lines. The gastric cancer cells that expanded in the spheres expressed relatively elevated proportion of CD44, which is a marker of gastric cancer stem cells (CSCs), and displayed many properties of CSCs, for example: chemoresistance, tumorigenicity and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) acquisition. SNAIL, which is a key factor in EMT, was highly expressed in the gastric spheres. Microarray analysis in gastric cancer cell line HGC27 showed that CCN3 and NEFL displayed the greatest differential expression by knocking down of SNAIL; the former was upregulated and the latter downregulated, respectively. Downregulation of CCN3 and upregulation of NEFL gene expression impaired the SNAIL-dependent EMT activity: high tumorigenicity, and chemoresistance in gastric cancer cells. Thus, approach that disrupts SNAIL/CCN3/NEFL axis may be credible in inhibiting gastric cancer development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available