4.7 Article

Redispersion and structural change evaluation of dried microfibrillated cellulose

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 252, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117165

Keywords

Cellulose nanofibers; Nanofibrils; Nanocellulose; Hornification; Crystallinity; Aggregates

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais - FAPEMIG
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq
  4. Bioproducts Research Unit (BRU - ARS) at the United States Department of Agriculture (Albany - CA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Commercializing dried microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) has been a challenge due to aggregation issues. This study found that drying/redispersion cycles at higher temperatures led to more severe aggregation, while milder action at room temperature once-drying maintained cellulose quality.
Commercializing dried microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) has always been a challenge mainly due to the tendency of MFC to aggregate. In this study MFC samples were submitted to drying/redispersion cycles at different temperatures. Morphology, crystallinity and mechanical performance of films were analyzed throughout the cycles. Microscopy images, particle size and stability in water showed that aggregation happens more severely with 5 drying/redispersion cycles and at drying temperatures of 75 and 100 degrees C. Particles once-dried at 20 degrees C formed the same size and web-like structure as the MFC-control. Crystallinity and crystallite sizes increased with drying/redispersion cycles especially when dried at 75 and 100 degrees C, however drying/redispersion cycles also led to a reduction in mechanical performance due to aggregation. While oven-drying is not the most suitable method, milder action at room temperature once-drying led to suspension stability in water, morphology and mechanical properties close to never-dried MFC, which makes this treatment a feasible option to maintain cellulose quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available