4.7 Article

Characterizing moisture uptake and plasticization effects of water on amorphous amylose starch models using molecular dynamics methods

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 252, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117161

Keywords

Amylose; Molecular dynamics; Glass transition temperature; Moisture uptake; Water transport; Metadynamics; Amorphous starch; Molecular simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molecular dynamics simulations were used to explore the dynamics and thermophysical properties of amorphous starch, showing good agreement with experimental data. The study revealed the plasticization effect of moisture content on amorphous starch and the depression of glass transition temperature as a function of moisture content.
Dynamics and thermophysical properties of amorphous starch were explored using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Using the OPLS3e force field, simulations of short amylose chains in water were performed to determine force field accuracy. Using well-tempered metadynamics, a free energy map of the two glycosidic angles of an amylose molecule was constructed and compared with other modern force fields. Good agreement of torsional sampling for both solvated and amorphous amylose starch models was observed. Using combined grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC)/MD simulations, a moisture sorption isotherm curve is predicted along with temperature dependence. Concentration-dependent activation energies for water transport agree quantitatively with previous experiments. Finally, the plasticization effect of moisture content on amorphous starch was investigated. Predicted glass transition temperature (T-g) depression as a function of moisture content is in line with experimental trends. Further, our calculations provide a value for the dry T-g for amorphous starch, a value which no experimental value is available.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available