4.8 Article

Tumor Mutational Burden Is Polygenic and Genetically Associated with Complex Traits and Diseases

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 81, Issue 5, Pages 1230-1239

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-3459

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Sylvia & Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation
  2. Australian Research Council [FT180100186]
  3. Westlake Education Foundation
  4. Australian Research Council [FT180100186] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uncovers a polygenic architecture of tumor mutational burden and suggests the potential use of whole-genome germline genetic variations to stratify cancer patients for immunotherapy.
Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is an emerging biomarker of response to immunotherapy in solid tumors. However, the extent to which variation in TMB between patients is attributable to germline genetic variation remains elusive. Here, using 7,004 unrelated patients of European descent across 33 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas, we show that pan-cancer TMB is polygenic with approximately 13% of its variation explained by approximately 1.1 million common variants altogether. We identify germline variants that affect TMB in stomach adenocarcinoma through altering the expression levels of BAG5 and KLC1. Further analyses provide evidence that TMB is genetically associated with complex traits and diseases, such as smoking, rheumatoid arthritis, height, and cancers, and some of the associations are likely causal. Overall, these results provide new insights into the genetic basis of somatic mutations in tumors and may inform future efforts to use genetic variants to stratify patients for immunotherapy. Significance: This study provides evidence for a polygenic architecture of tumor mutational burden and opens an avenue for the use of whole-genome germline genetic variations to stratify patients with cancer for immunotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available