4.8 Article

PLK1 Induces Chromosomal Instability and Overrides Cell-Cycle Checkpoints to Drive Tumorigenesis

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 81, Issue 5, Pages 1293-1307

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-1377

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. American Cancer Society [127626-RSG-15-005-01-CCG]
  2. NIH [R01 CA191002]
  3. NIH-NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA016059]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Overexpression of Plk1 drives tumorigenesis by causing chromosomal instability and aneuploidy, and higher expression of PLK1 is associated with increased genome-wide copy-number alterations in multiple human cancers. These findings suggest potential therapeutic opportunities for CIN-positive cancers.
Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is an essential cell-cycle regulator that is frequently overexpressed in various human cancers. To determine whether Plk1 overexpression drives tumorigenesis, we established transgenic mouse lines that ubiquitously express increased levels of Plk1. High Plk1 levels were a driving force for different types of spontaneous tumors. Increased Plk1 levels resulted in multiple defects in mitosis and cytokinesis, supernumerary centrosomes, and compromised cell-cycle checkpoints, allowing accumulation of chromosomal instability (CIN), which resulted in aneuploidy and tumor formation. Clinically, higher expression of PLK1 positively associated with an increase in genome-wide copy-number alterations in multiple human cancers. This study provides in vivo evidence that aberrant expression of PLK1 triggers CIN and tumorigenesis and highlights potential therapeutic opportunities for CIN-positive cancers. Significance: These findings establish roles for PLK1 as a potent proto-oncogene and a CIN gene and provide insights for the development of effective treatment regimens across PLK1-overexpressing and CIN-positive cancers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available