4.8 Article

Interactive Classification of Whole-Slide Imaging Data for Cancer Researchers

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages 1171-1177

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-0668

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH/NCI [U01CA220401, U24CA19436201]
  2. NIH/National Library of Medicine [KLM011576A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HistomicsML2 is a software tool for training machine learning classifiers, guiding users to informative training examples and improving efficiency and performance. It can be used for developing classifiers for different cancer types or as a rapid annotation tool.
Whole-slide histology images contain information that is valuable for clinical and basic science investigations of cancer but extracting quantitative measurements from these images is challenging for researchers who are not image analysis specialists. In this article, we describe HistomicsML2, a software tool for learn-byexample training of machine learning classifiers for histologic patterns in whole-slide images. This tool improves training efficiency and classifier performance by guiding users to the most informative training examples for labeling and can be used to develop classifiers for prospective application or as a rapid annotation tool that is adaptable to different cancer types. HistomicsML2 runs as a containerized server application that provides web-based user interfaces for classifier training, validation, exporting inference results, and collaborative review, and that can be deployed on GPU servers or cloud platforms. We demonstrate the utility of this tool by using it to classify tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast carcinoma and cutaneous melanoma. Significance: An interactive machine learning tool for analyzing digital pathology images enables cancer researchers to apply this tool to measure histologic patterns for dinical and basic science studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available