4.7 Article

Phase 2 study of lenalidomide maintenance for patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia in remission

Journal

CANCER
Volume 127, Issue 11, Pages 1894-1900

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33409

Keywords

acute myeloid leukemia (AML); immunomodulation; lenalidomide; maintenance

Categories

Funding

  1. Celgene
  2. National Institutes of Health [P30 CA016672]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of lenalidomide as a maintenance strategy in high-risk AML patients who are not suitable for ASCT, with beneficial effects for patients with negative measurable residual disease. Despite some patients experiencing serious adverse events, lenalidomide is generally well tolerated.
Background New drug combinations have led to significant improvements in remission rates for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, many patients with high-risk AML who respond to their initial treatment and are not candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) will eventually relapse with poor outcomes. Methods In this phase 2 trial, the efficacy of lenalidomide maintenance was evaluated in patients with high-risk AML who had achieved their first or second remission after induction chemotherapy and at least 1 consolidation cycle and who were not candidates for immediate ASCT. Lenalidomide was given orally at 10 to 20 mg daily on days 1 to 28 of a 28-day cycle for up to 24 cycles. Results A total of 28 patients were enrolled in this study with a median age of 61 years (range, 24-87 years). The median number of cycles was 8 (range, 1-24 cycles). Ten patients (36%) completed 24 months of maintenance treatment. With a median follow-up of 22.5 months (range, 2.6-55 months), 12 patients (43%) relapsed after a median of 3 months (range, 0.7-23 months). The median duration of remission for all patients was 18.7 months (range, 0.7-55.1 months). The 2-year overall survival and relapse-free survival rates from the time of enrollment were 63% and 50%, respectively. Overall, lenalidomide was well tolerated; serious adverse events of grade 3 or 4, including rash (n = 5), thrombocytopenia (n = 4), neutropenia (n = 4), and fatigue (n = 2), were observed in 13 patients (46%). Conclusions Lenalidomide is a safe and feasible maintenance strategy in patients with high-risk AML who are not candidates for ASCT, and it has beneficial effects for patients with negative measurable residual disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available