4.4 Review

A Systematic Review of Animal Models of Disuse-Induced Bone Loss

Journal

CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 108, Issue 5, Pages 561-575

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00223-020-00799-9

Keywords

Animal models; Disuse; Immobilization; Bone loss; Mechanical unloading

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple animal models of disuse-induced bone loss exist, with rats (59%) and mice (30%) being the most commonly used species. Hindlimb unloading (44%), neurectomy (15%), bandages and orthoses (15%), and botulinum toxin (9%) were the most frequently used methods to induce disuse. The median time of disuse was 21 days (quartiles: 14 days, 36 days), with a median number of animals per group subjected to disuse being 10 (quartiles: 7, 14).
Objective Several different animal models are used to study disuse-induced bone loss. This systematic review aims to give a comprehensive overview of the animal models of disuse-induced bone loss and provide a detailed narrative synthesis of each unique animal model. Methods PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for animal models of disuse from inception to November 30, 2019. In addition, Google Scholar and personal file archives were searched for relevant publications not indexed in PubMed or Embase. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles and abstracts for full-text inclusion. Data were extracted using a predefined extraction scheme to ensure standardization. Results 1964 titles and abstracts were screened of which 653 full-text articles were included. The most common animal species used to model disuse were rats (59%) and mice (30%). Males (53%) where used in the majority of the studies and genetically modified animals accounted for 7%. Twelve different methods to induce disuse were identified. The most frequently used methods were hindlimb unloading (44%), neurectomy (15%), bandages and orthoses (15%), and botulinum toxin (9%). The median time of disuse was 21 days (quartiles: 14 days, 36 days) and the median number of animals per group subjected to disuse was 10 (quartiles: 7, 14). Random group allocation was reported in 43% of the studies. Fewer than 5% of the studies justified the number of animals per group by a sample size calculation to ensure adequate statistical power. Conclusion Multiple animal models of disuse-induced bone loss exist, and several species of animals have successfully been studied. The complexity of disuse-induced bone loss warrants rigid research study designs. This systematic review emphasized the need for standardization of animal disuse research and reporting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available