4.7 Article

Unfractionated heparin inhibits live wild type SARS-CoV-2 cell infectivity at therapeutically relevant concentrations

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 178, Issue 3, Pages 626-635

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bph.15304

Keywords

COVID-19; heparin; LMWH; nebulised; SARS-CoV-2; UFH

Funding

  1. Public Health England
  2. University of Liverpool
  3. University of Keele
  4. BBSRC [BB/L023717/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [G0700852] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparison of clinically relevant heparins showed that unfractionated heparin (UFH) has significantly stronger antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 compared to low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), directly inhibiting the binding of spike protein to the human ACE2 receptor. These findings support further clinical investigation of UFH as a potential treatment for COVID-19 patients.
Background and Purpose: Currently, there are no licensed vaccines and limited antivirals for the treatment of COVID-19. Heparin (delivered systemically) is currently used to treat anticoagulant anomalies in COVID-19 patients. Additionally, in the United Kingdom, Brazil and Australia, nebulised unfractionated heparin (UFH) is being trialled in COVID-19 patients as a potential treatment. A systematic comparison of the potential antiviral effect of various heparin preparations on live wild type SARS-CoV-2, in vitro, is needed. Experimental Approach: Seven different heparin preparations including UFH and low MW heparins (LMWH) of porcine or bovine origin were screened for antiviral activity against live SARS-CoV-2 (Australia/VIC01/2020) using a plaque inhibition assay with Vero E6 cells. Interaction of heparin with spike protein RBD was studied using differential scanning fluorimetry and the inhibition of RBD binding to human ACE2 protein using elisa assays was examined. Key Results: All the UFH preparations had potent antiviral effects, with IC50 values ranging between 25 and 41 mu g.ml(-1), whereas LMWHs were less inhibitory by similar to 150-fold (IC50 range 3.4-7.8 mg.ml(-1)). Mechanistically, we observed that heparin binds and destabilizes the RBD protein and furthermore, we show heparin directly inhibits the binding of RBD to the human ACE2 protein receptor. Conclusion and Implications: This comparison of clinically relevant heparins shows that UFH has significantly stronger SARS-CoV-2 antiviral activity compared to LMWHs. UFH acts to directly inhibit binding of spike protein to the human ACE2 protein receptor. Overall, the data strongly support further clinical investigation of UFH as a potential treatment for patients with COVID-19.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available