4.6 Article

Clinically applicable approach for predicting mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
Volume 126, Issue 3, Pages 578-589

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.11.034

Keywords

COVID-19; critical care medicine; machine learning; mechanical ventilation; predictive models; respiratory insufficiency; respiratory failure

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [K01-HL141701]
  2. Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study leveraged machine learning techniques to predict the need for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients, identifying key vital sign predictors such as SpO(2)/FiO(2) ratio, ventilatory frequency, and heart rate. The model demonstrated good discrimination, helping to identify high-risk patients and provide insight into accompanying symptoms of respiratory failure in COVID-19.
Background: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring mechanical ventilation have high mortality and resource utilisation. The ability to predict which patients may require mechanical ventilation allows increased acuity of care and targeted interventions to potentially mitigate deterioration. Methods: We included hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in this single-centre retrospective observational study. Our primary outcome was mechanical ventilation or death within 24 h. As clinical decompensation is more recognisable, but less modifiable, as the prediction window shrinks, we also assessed 4, 8, and 48 h prediction windows. Model features included demographic information, laboratory results, comorbidities, medication administration, and vital signs. We created a Random Forest model, and assessed performance using 10-fold cross-validation. The model was compared with models derived from generalised estimating equations using discrimination. Results: Ninety-three (23%) of 398 patients required mechanical ventilation or died within 14 days of admission. The Random Forest model predicted pending mechanical ventilation with good discrimination (C-statistic=0.858; 95% confidence interval, 0.841-0.874), which is comparable with the discrimination of the generalised estimating equation regression. Vitals sign data including SpO(2)/FiO(2) ratio (Random Forest Feature Importance Z-score=8.56), ventilatory frequency (5.97), and heart rate (5.87) had the highest predictive utility. In our highest-risk cohort, the number of patients needed to identify a single new case was 3.2, and for our second quintile it was 5.0. Conclusion: Machine learning techniques can be leveraged to improve the ability to predict which patients with COVID-19 are likely to require mechanical ventilation, identifying unrecognised bellwethers and providing insight into the constellation of accompanying signs of respiratory failure in COVID-19.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available