Journal
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
Volume 126, Issue 3, Pages 700-705Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.039
Keywords
multimodal analgesia; patient-controlled analgesia; physostigmine; preventive analgesia; quantitative sensory testing
Categories
Funding
- Styrian Provincial Government [16.A-99/2012-1]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study found that intraoperative physostigmine did not affect opioid consumption but increased mechanical pain thresholds, reduced hyperalgesia distance and wind-up ratios, and lowered postoperative pain scores. Patients in the physostigmine group also reported lower Pain Disability Index and higher satisfaction with pain control after 3 months, suggesting that physostigmine has antihyperalgesic effects and can attenuate sensitisation processes.
Background: Several studies have shown that cholinergic mechanisms play a pivotal role in the anti-nociceptive system by acting synergistically with morphine and reducing postoperative opioid consumption. In addition, the anticholinesterase drug physostigmine that increases synaptic acetylcholine concentrations has anti-inflammatory effects. Methods: In this randomised placebo-controlled trial including 110 patients undergoing nephrectomy, we evaluated the effects of intraoperative physostigmine 0.5 mg h(-1) i.v. for 24 h on opioid consumption, hyperalgesia, pain scores, and satisfaction with pain control. Results: Physostigmine infusion did not affect opioid consumption compared with placebo. However, the mechanical pain threshold was significantly higher (2.3 [ SD 0.3]) vs 2.2 [0.4]; P=0.0491), and the distance from the suture line of hyperalgesia (5.9 [3.3] vs 8.5 [4.6]; P=0.006), wind-up ratios (2.2 [1.5] vs 3.1 [1.5]; P=0.0389), and minimum and maximum postoperative pain scores at 24 h (minimum 1.8 [1.0] vs 2.4 [1.2]; P=0.0451; and maximum 3.2 [1.4] vs 4.2 [1.4]; P=0.0081) and 48 h (minimum 0.9 [1.0] vs 1.6 [1.1]; P=0.0101; and maximum 2.0 [1.5] vs 3.2 [1.6]; P=0.0029) were lower in the study group. Pain Disability Index was lower and satisfaction with pain control was higher after 3 months in the physostigmine group. Conclusions: In contrast to previous trials, physostigmine did not reduce opioid consumption. As pain thresholds were higher and hyperalgesia and wind-up lower in the physostigmine group, we conclude that physostigmine has antihyperalgesic effects and attenuates sensitisation processes. Intraoperative physostigmine may be a useful and safe addition to conventional postoperative pain control.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available