4.5 Article

Cord blood maternal microchimerism following unrelated cord blood transplantation

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages 1090-1098

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-020-01149-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01HL117737]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that maternal cells from the cord blood graft can be tracked in recipients post-CBT, potentially reducing the risk of leukemia relapse, mortality, and treatment failure. Further investigation into cord blood maternal microchimerism is essential for sustained remission from leukemia following CBT.
Cord blood transplantation (CBT) is associated with low risk of leukemia relapse. Mechanisms underlying antileukemia benefit of CBT are not well understood, however a previous study strongly but indirectly implicated cells from the mother of the cord blood (CB) donor. A fetus acquires a small number of maternal cells referred to as maternal microchimerism (MMc) and MMc is sometimes detectable in CB. From a series of 95 patients who underwent double or single CBT at our center, we obtained or generated HLA-genotyping of CB mothers in 68. We employed a technique of highly sensitive HLA-specific quantitative-PCR assays targeting polymorphisms unique to the CB mother to assay CB-MMc in patients post-CBT. After additional exclusion criteria, CB-MMc was evaluated at multiple timepoints in 36 patients (529 specimens). CB-MMc was present in seven (19.4%) patients in bone marrow, peripheral blood, innate and adaptive immune cell subsets, and was detected up to 1-year post-CBT. Statistical trends to lower relapse, mortality, and treatment failure were observed for patients with vs. without CB-MMc post-CBT. Our study provides proof-of-concept that maternal cells of the CB graft can be tracked in recipients post-CBT, and underscore the importance of further investigating CB-MMc in sustained remission from leukemia following CBT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available