4.5 Article

Clinical and cost effectiveness of arthritis gloves in rheumatoid arthritis (A-GLOVES): randomised controlled trial with economic analysis

Journal

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03917-8

Keywords

Rheumatoid arthritis; Rehabilitation; Hand; Pain; Orthotic devices; Clinical trial

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) [PB-PG-0214-33010]
  2. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PB-PG-0214-33010] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the clinical and cost effectiveness of arthritis gloves and placebo gloves in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and persistent hand pain. The results showed that arthritis gloves did not have a clinically important effect on hand pain, function, or stiffness, and were not cost-effective.
BackgroundArthritis (or compression) gloves are widely prescribed to people with rheumatoid arthritis and other forms of hand arthritis. They are prescribed for daytime wear to reduce hand pain and improve hand function, and/or night-time wear to reduce pain, improve sleep and reduce morning stiffness. However, evidence for their effectiveness is limited. The aims of this study were to investigate the clinical and cost effectiveness of arthritis gloves compared to placebo gloves on hand pain, stiffness and function in people with rheumatoid arthritis and persistent hand pain.MethodsA parallel randomised controlled trial, in adults (>= 18years) with rheumatoid or undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis at 16 National Health Service sites in the UK. Patients with persistent hand pain affecting function and/or sleep were eligible. Randomisation (1:1) was stratified by recent change (or not) in medication, using permuted blocks of random sizes. Three-quarter-finger length arthritis gloves (Isotoner (R): applying 23-32mmHg pressure) (intervention) were compared to loose-fitting placebo gloves (Jobskin (R) classic: providing no/minimal pressure) (control). Both gloves (considered to have similar thermal qualities) were provided by occupational therapists. Patients and outcome assessors were blinded; clinicians were not. The primary outcome was dominant hand pain on activity (0-10) at 12weeks, analysed using linear regression and intention to treat principles.ResultsTwo hundred six participants were randomly assigned (103 per arm) and 163 (84 intervention: 79 control) completed 12-week follow-up. Hand pain improved by 1.0 (intervention) and 1.2 (control), an adjusted mean difference of 0.10 (95%CI: -0.47 to 0.67; p = 0.72). Adverse events were reported by 51% of intervention and 36% of control group participants; with 6 and 7% respectively, discontinuing glove wear. Provision of arthritis gloves cost 129, with no additional benefit.ConclusionThe trial provides evidence of no clinically important effect of arthritis gloves on any of the trial outcomes (hand pain, function and stiffness) and arthritis gloves are not cost-effective. The clinical and cost-effectiveness results support ceasing provision of arthritis gloves in routine clinical practice. Funding: National Institute for Health Research.Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN25892131; Registered 05/09/2016: retrospectively registered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available