4.6 Article

Reliability and failure behavior of CAD-on fixed partial dentures

Journal

DENTAL MATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 624-630

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.01.013

Keywords

Dental ceramics; Fatigue; Lithium disilicate; Zirconia; Step stress

Funding

  1. CAPES/Brazil
  2. CNPq/Brazil [304995/2013-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. To estimate the reliability and failure behavior of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated using the CAD-on technique. Methods. FPDs (n=25) were fabricated using a CAD/CAM system: IPS e.max ZirCAD - Crystall./Connect and IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar). The restoration type (three-unit bridge) and design method (multilayer) based on Biogenerics were used. Framework and porcelain structures were united using a fusion ceramic (Crystall./Connect, Ivoclar). Mechanical fatigue was tested in a servohydraulic load frame machine at a cyclic loading (frequency: 2 Hz; load ratio: 0.1). Based on previous data from specimens tested in fast fracture, three different stress profiles were used. The lifetime data were analyzed using an inverse power law-Weibull cumulative damage model (ALTA PRO, Reliasoft). All failed specimens were examined under a field emission scanning electron microscope. Results. Porcelain chipping was the predominant (60%) mode of failure for FPDs tested in fast fracture and connector failure was predominant (67%) under fatigue. For fast fracture data, the Weibull modulus (beta) of FPDs was 7.8 combining the two failure modes. When chipping and connector fracture data were analyzed separately, beta values were 7.9 and 2.9. For the step stress fatigue test, beta values were lower than estimated using fast fracture, being 1.6 for connector fracture and 1.3 for porcelain chipping. Significance. The test method (fast fracture or fatigue) significantly influenced the reliability of FPDs fabricated using the CAD-on technique, but it did not influence their failure behavior. (C) 2016 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available