Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Examining Cesarean Section Rates in Canada Using the Modified Robson Classification
Jing Gu et al.
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA (2020)
Perinatal health monitoring through a European lens: eight lessons from the Euro-Peristat report on 2015 births
J. Zeitlin et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2019)
Is high use of caesarean section sometimes justified?
Georgios C. Pratilas et al.
LANCET (2019)
The Robson 10-group classification in Iceland: Obstetric interventions and outcomes
Kristjana Einarsdottir et al.
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE (2019)
The 10-Group Classification System-a new way of thinking
Michael S. Robson
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2018)
Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005 through 2014: a population-based analysis using the Robson 10-Group Classification System
Mark P. Hehir et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2018)
Developing a set of consensus indicators to support maternity service quality improvement: using Core Outcome Set methodology including a Delphi process
K. J. Bunch et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2018)
Differences in caesarean rates across women's socio-economic status by diverse obstetric indications: Cross-sectional study
Kamala Adhikari et al.
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)
Use of indications to identify appropriate caesarean section rates
Michael Stephen Robson
LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH (2018)
Quantifying the burden of stillbirths before 28 weeks of completed gestational age in high-income countries: a population-based study of 19 European countries
Lucy K. Smith et al.
LANCET (2018)
Caesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis
Ilir Hoxha et al.
BMJ OPEN (2017)
Cesarean section trends in the Nordic Countries - a comparative analysis with the Robson classification
Aura Pyykonen et al.
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA (2017)
Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study
A. J. Macfarlane et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2016)
WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates
A. P. Betran et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2016)
The Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) - a common starting point for more detailed analysis
M. Robson
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2015)
Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys
Joshua P. Vogel et al.
LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH (2015)
Stabilising the caesarean rate: which target population?
C. Le Ray et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2015)
Clinicians' practice environment is associated with a higher likelihood of recommending cesarean deliveries
Yvonne W. Cheng et al.
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE (2014)
A Systematic Review of the Robson Classification for Caesarean Section: What Works, Doesn't Work and How to Improve It
Ana Pilar Betran et al.
PLOS ONE (2014)
Varying gestational age patterns in cesarean delivery: an international comparison
Marie Delnord et al.
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH (2014)
Fear of Litigation and Cesarean Section Rates
Howard Minkoff
SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY (2012)
Epidemiology and trends for Caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: A population-based study
Efty P. Stavrou et al.
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH (2011)
Variability in caesarean section rates for very preterm births at 28-31 weeks of gestation in 10 European regions: Results of the MOSAIC project
Jennifer Zeitlin et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY (2010)
Perinatal health monitoring in Europe: results from the EURO-PERISTAT project
Mika Gissler et al.
INFORMATICS FOR HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE (2010)
Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option?: Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium
F Goffinet et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2006)
Share Paper
