4.7 Article

Non-destructive measurement of chicken egg characteristics: Improved formulae for calculating egg volume and surface area

Journal

BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Volume 201, Issue -, Pages 42-49

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.11.006

Keywords

Non-destructive measurement; Egg volume; Egg surface area; Computation error; Hugelschaffer's model; Simulation modelling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The external characteristics of chicken eggs, including volume and surface area, were accurately estimated using improved formulas based on non-destructive measurement data. The average errors in calculating volume and surface area were found to be 1.1% and 0.3%, respectively. Further improvement on these formulas may not be feasible.
The key external characteristics of chicken eggs that should be accurately estimated for various applications in poultry research, food engineering and technology development areas are volume (V) and surface area (S), although many researchers often use approximate calculation formulae proposed back in the middle of the last century. These were based on speculative constants and prone to computational errors. Using Hugelschaffer's model and simulation modelling, we generated 1820 various combinations of eggs, according to which V and S were computed with more accurate and simplified formulae that we have improved here. As a result, dependencies were obtained for a simplified calculation of these parameters using only non-destructive measurement data on the egg length and maximum breadth, with the average error in calculating V being 1.1% and that for S 0.3%. The produced equations for V and S of chicken eggs can be used in non-invasive measurement of egg characteristics. Further improvement of these formulae does not seem feasible, suggesting closing for now the polemic about more acceptable calculation of these egg variables and relevant computation errors and constants. (C) 2020 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available