4.3 Review

The diagnostic and clinicopathological value of trefoil factor 3 in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

BIOMARKERS
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 95-102

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1354750X.2020.1871411

Keywords

Gastric cancer; trefoil factor 3; diagnosis; immunohistochemistry; meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TFF3 shows promise as a biomarker for gastric cancer, with its expression potentially playing a role in invasion, metastasis, and differentiation of the disease.
Objective To assess the diagnostic value of Trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) and the correlation between TFF3 expression and clinicopathological features in patients with gastric cancer (GC). Methods PubMed, The Cochrane, EMbase, and Web of Science were retrieved comprehensively to collect relevant literature. The search ended on 31 May 2020. All data were analyzed using PubMed, The Cochrane, EMbase, and Web of Science were retrieved to collect relevant articles. All data from the included studies were subjected to meta-analysis using Stata 12.0 software. Results Seventeen studies involved 4654 subjects were included. For the diagnostic value of TFF3 for GC, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.71, 0.80, and 0.80, respectively. For the clinicopathological value of TFF3, tissue TFF3 expression showed a higher risk of lymph node metastasis (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.75-2.78, p < 0.001) and muscularis propria invasion (>= T2) (1.51, 1.13-2.03, p = 0.006), as well as worse TNM stage (2.26, 1.63-3.12, p < 0.001) and histological type (1.72, 1.34-2.20, p < 0.001), while no apparent relationship was found for serous membrane invasion (T4), venous invasion, and peritoneal metastasis. Conclusion TFF3 may be a promising biomarker for GC, and the TFF3 expression is likely to be involved in the invasion, metastasis, and differentiation of GC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available