4.5 Article

Molecular Biology of Cadmium Toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Journal

BIOLOGICAL TRACE ELEMENT RESEARCH
Volume 199, Issue 12, Pages 4832-4846

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s12011-021-02584-7

Keywords

Cadmium; Molecular biology; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Toxicity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cadmium, a toxic heavy metal from industrial activities, causes various metabolic effects and signaling pathway activations in living beings. Exposure to cadmium stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in protein structural changes, cell cycle disruption, and oxidative stress.
Cadmium (Cd) is a toxic heavy metal mainly originating from industrial activities and causes environmental pollution. To better understand its toxicity and pollution remediation, we must understand the effects of Cd on living beings. Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast) is an eukaryotic unicellular model organism. It has provided much scientific knowledge about cellular and molecular biology in addition to its economic benefits. Effects associated with copper and zinc, sulfur and selenium metabolism, calcium (Ca2+) balance/signaling, and structure of phospholipids as a result of exposure to cadmium have been evaluated. In yeast as a result of cadmium stress, mitogen-activated protein kinase, high osmolarity glycerol, and cell wall integrity pathways have been reported to activate different signaling pathways. In addition, abnormalities and changes in protein structure, ribosomes, cell cycle disruption, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) following cadmium cytotoxicity have also been detailed. Moreover, the key OLE1 gene that encodes for delta-9 FA desaturase in relation to cadmium toxicity has been discussed in more detail. Keeping all these studies in mind, an attempt has been made to evaluate published cellular and molecular toxicity data related to Cd stress, and specifically published on S. cerevisiae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available