4.5 Article

Kidney Cadmium Concentrations in an Urban Sri Lankan Population: an Autopsy Study

Journal

BIOLOGICAL TRACE ELEMENT RESEARCH
Volume 199, Issue 11, Pages 4045-4054

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s12011-020-02541-w

Keywords

Cadmium exposure risk; Environmental contamination; Human biomonitoring; Autopsy material; Betel chewing

Funding

  1. National Research Council (NRC) of Sri Lanka [15-017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study in Sri Lanka found that there is no high exposure risk to environmental cadmium contamination based on the analysis of cadmium bioaccumulation in kidneys of deceased individuals who underwent forensic autopsies in Colombo.
Contamination and bioaccumulation of toxic heavy metals in our geo-environment is a growing public health concern. Human biomonitoring is an essential step in assessing the population risk of chronic exposure to environmental contaminants. Whole kidneys collected from a cohort of 92 deceased individuals undergoing forensic autopsies in Colombo, Sri Lanka, were analysed for cadmium (Cd) bioaccumulation using ICP-MS. Mean age of the population was 55.4 +/- 15.4 years. Mean and median renal Cd concentrations of the total population were 4.38 and 2.60 mu g g(-1) w/w, respectively, which were below estimated toxic ranges. Males accumulated higher levels of Cd than females (p = 0.377). Cd concentrations were higher in the < 60 age group than the > 60 age group (p = 0.92), while the highest levels were reported in 51-60 age group. However, no significant correlation was found between renal Cd concentration and age ((b) = - 0.005, p = 0.94). Individuals who smoked, chewed betel or consumed alcohol were found to have elevated renal Cd concentrations in comparison to those who did not use these substances. This is the largest autopsy study on renal Cd bioaccumulation in Sri Lanka, and the findings do not indicate a high exposure risk to environmental Cd contamination at present.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available