Rewilding the world's large carnivores without neglecting the human dimension A response to reintroducing the Eurasian lynx to southern Scotland, England and Wales

Rewilding is a growing conservation concept that seeks to enhance biodiversity and improve ecosystem functioning. When rewilding includes the reintroduction of large carnivores to landscapes from which they have been extirpated, assessing the societal impacts and acceptability is as, if not more, important than assessing the ecological feasibility (in: Smith et al, Application to Natural England for the trial reintroduction of lynx to England, Lynx UK Trust, Kielder, 2015a, Application for the trial reintroduction of lynx to Scotland, Lynx UK Trust, Kielder, 2015b; Johnson and Greenwood 2020). We caution that not including the human dimension when modelling the feasibility of a particular conservation action will produce flawed results by masking potentially low public acceptance and conflicts with particular stakeholders. Furthermore, repeated failure to work within a socio-ecological system (SES) framework threatens to alienate key stakeholders, particularly when NGOs propose trial reintroductions prior to any rigorous consideration of the human dimension. When the interests of one party (e.g. NGOs or conservationists) are perceived to be asserted over the interests of others (e.g. small-livestock farmers), the stage is set for a conservation conflict. Conservation conflicts not only hamper worthwhile conservation initiatives but drive a wedge between key stakeholders that need to agree on a clear long-term conservation and management plan before the state will accede to such proposals.

Automated summary

When reintroducing wild animals to habitats, it is crucial to consider both ecological feasibility and societal impacts and acceptability to avoid potential public opposition and conflicts of interest.