4.6 Review

How individuals make choices explains addiction's distinctive, non-eliminable features

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 397, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112899

Keywords

Addiction; Substance use disorder; Drug abuse; Matching law; Choice; Remission; Optimal choice; Kicking the habit; Going cold turkey; Hitting Bottom

Funding

  1. Boston College

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the non-eliminable features of addiction and the underlying basic choice processes, suggesting that addiction emerges from the interactions of normal choice processes and the behaviorally toxic effects of drugs. The analysis shows that addiction is a semi-stable state biased towards remission, with high rates of unassisted or spontaneous remission.
In keeping with the goals of this Special Issue, this paper poses the following questions: What are addiction's non-eliminable features and can they be explained by one or more general principles? I have added the qualifier distinctive to these goals, as in distinctive non-eliminable features. The result is a highly heterogeneous list, which includes features of addiction's natural history, such as its high remission rates, its unique idioms (e.g., kicking the habit), and its patented interventions, such as Alcoholics Anonymous. I show that each of these distinctive features reflects how individuals make choices. In particular, they reflect the competing claims of two basic choice processes: global maximizing of the sort assumed in introductory economics textbooks and Herrnstein's matching law, which has empirical rather than theoretical roots. These are basic choice processes, which apply to all decision making, not just drugs and not just addicts. Nevertheless, they can result in addiction when one of the options has the capacity to undermine the value of competing interests and undermine global maximizing. Conversely, the analyses also show that the two basic choice processes combine so as to predict that addiction is a semi-stable state that is biased to resolve in favor of remission. These predictions are supported by the high rates of addiction, by the high rates of remission from addiction, and by the fact that remission is often unassisted or spontaneous. The analyses fail to support the idea that pathological psychological processes lead to addiction. Rather they show that addiction emerges from the interactions of normal choice processes and the behaviorally toxic effects of drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available