4.6 Article

The gut microbiome and antipsychotic treatment response

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 396, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112886

Keywords

Antipsychotics; Microbiome; Diet; Metabolism; Schizophrenia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The review examines the potential role of intestinal organisms in response/non-response to antipsychotics, highlighting that current research in this area is mostly theoretical but showing increasing evidence from animal experiments and clinical trials on the impact of gut bacteria on drug response.
Patients with psychosis usually respond to one antipsychotic drug and not to another; one third fail to respond to any. Some patients, who initially do well, stop responding. Some develop serious side effects even at low doses. While several of the reasons for this variability are known, many are not. The aim of this review is to explore the potential role of intestinal organisms in response/non-response to antipsychotics. Much of the literature in this field is relatively new and still, for the most part, theoretical. A growing number of animal experiments and clinical trials are starting to point, however, to substantial effects of antipsychotics on the composition of gut bacteria and, reciprocally, to the effects of microbiota on the pharmacokinetics of antipsychotic medication. Because so many factors influence the constituents of the human intestine, it is difficult, at present, to sort out how much one or more either enhance or dampen the benefits of antipsychotics or the character/severity of the adverse effects they induce. Dietary and other therapies are being devised to reverse dysbiosis. If successful, such therapies plus the modification of factors that, together, are known to determine the composition of microbiota could help to maximize the effectiveness of currently available antipsychotic therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available