4.5 Article

Evaluating users' preference for the appearance of humanoid robots via event-related potentials and spectral perturbations

Journal

BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 7, Pages 1381-1397

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2021.1876763

Keywords

Users' preference; humanoid robot appearance; neural dynamics; ERP; ERSP

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [72071035, 71771045, 71701039]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated users' neural dynamics underlying preference formation for the appearance of humanoid robots, revealing a distinctive dual-stage of neural dynamics in users' preference formation. The results provide designers with an objective method in evaluating users' preference for the appearance of humanoid robots.
Even though humanoid robots are being applied to diverse areas, the formation of users' preference for the appearance of humanoid robots remains unknown. The present study investigated users' neural dynamics underlying preference formation to evaluate users' preference for the appearance of humanoid robots. EEG signals were recorded in a preference categorisation task, and neural dynamics were analysed via event-related potentials and time-frequency analysis. The results showed that in the early stage, the preferred humanoid robot appearances elicited enhanced parieto-occipital N1, frontal P2, and early central and parieto-occipital theta rhythm power than the non-preferred appearances. In the later stage, the preferred humanoid robot appearances elicited enhanced scalp-distributed LPP and later central and parieto-occipital theta power than the non-preferred appearances. The results suggested that the formation of users' preference for the appearance of humanoid robots has a distinctive dual-stage of neural dynamics. The study provides designers with an objective method in evaluating users' preference for the appearance of humanoid robots.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available