4.6 Review

DGK and DZHK position paper on genome editing: basic science applications and future perspective

Journal

BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00395-020-00839-3

Keywords

Animal models; CRISPR/Cas; Genome editing; Animal models

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL
  2. DGK
  3. DZHK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gene editing has evolved from a scientific concept to a widely used technology in laboratories, with revolutionary implications for basic science and clinical treatment. Researchers are striving to advance the field by developing new techniques and combining cellular and animal applications to address challenges in gene editing.
For a long time, gene editing had been a scientific concept, which was limited to a few applications. With recent developments, following the discovery of TALEN zinc-finger endonucleases and in particular the CRISPR/Cas system, gene editing has become a technique applicable in most laboratories. The current gain- and loss-of function models in basic science are revolutionary as they allow unbiased screens of unprecedented depth and complexity and rapid development of transgenic animals. Modifications of CRISPR/Cas have been developed to precisely interrogate epigenetic regulation or to visualize DNA complexes. Moreover, gene editing as a clinical treatment option is rapidly developing with first trials on the way. This article reviews the most recent progress in the field, covering expert opinions gathered during joint conferences on genome editing of the German Cardiac Society (DGK) and the German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK). Particularly focusing on the translational aspect and the combination of cellular and animal applications, the authors aim to provide direction for the development of the field and the most frequent applications with their problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available