4.0 Article

Effect of different irrigation protocols for applications in regenerative endodontics on mechanical properties of root dentin

Journal

AUSTRALIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 228-235

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aej.12457

Keywords

dentin Flexural strength; dentin microhardness; NaOCl; regenerative endodontics; vicker’ s hardness test

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that increasing NaOCl concentration significantly reduced the mechanical properties of dentin, while the concentrations recommended for regenerative endodontic treatment did not have a significant effect on dentin mechanical properties. However, the use of passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) with increased irrigation time may have an effect, even with low NaOCl concentration.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations of NaOCl with and without passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) on mechanical properties of human dentin for applications in regenerative endodontics (RE). Sixty single-rooted teeth were sectioned into 2 halves (n = 120). Dentin bars were produced from one half for flexural strength and the other half was used for microhardness. Specimens were randomly assigned into 10 groups: G1 and G2 (control): distilled water for 30 and 60 min, respectively; G3: 1.5%NaOCl for 30 min; G4:1.5%NaOCl for 60 min; G5: 1.5%NaOCl + PUI for 30 min; G6: 1.5%NaOCl + PUI for 60 min; G7: 5.25%NaOCl for 30 min; G8: 5.25%NaOCl for 60 min; G9: 5.25%NaOCl + PUI for 30 min; G10: 5.25%NaOCl + PUI for 60 min. An increase in NaOCl concentration showed highly significant reduction in mechanical properties. There was no significant difference between 1.5% NaOCl and control group except for specimens treated with PUI for 60 min. NaOCl in concentrations recommended for RE did not have a significant effect on mechanical properties of dentin. However, PUI with increased irrigation time might have an effect even with low NaOCl concentration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available