4.6 Article

Computational general relativistic force-free electrodynamics: II. Characterization of numerical diffusivity

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 647, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038908

Keywords

magnetic fields; methods: numerical; plasmas

Funding

  1. Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
  2. PHAROS COST Action [CA16214]
  3. GWverse COST Action [CA16104]
  4. Ramon y Cajal [RYC-2015-19074]
  5. Exascale Computing Project of US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science [17-SC-20-SC]
  6. Exascale Computing Project of National Nuclear Security Administration [17-SC-20-SC]
  7. US Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  8. National Science Foundation (NSF) [OAC-1550436, AST-1516150, PHY-1607520, PHY-1305730, PHY1707946, PHY-1726215]
  9. [AYA2015-66899-C2-1-P]
  10. [PGC2018-095984-B-I00]
  11. [PROMETEO-II-2014-069]
  12. [PROMETEU/2019/071]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scientific codes serve as a crucial link between theory and experiment, providing insight into extreme energy flows in the universe. Understanding numerical diffusion in these codes is essential for assessing their reliability, with a minimum of eight numerical cells per characteristic size needed for consistency between numerical and physical results. High-order discretization of force-free currents can achieve nearly ideal convergence for smooth plasma wave dynamics, but modeling resistive layers requires suitable current prescriptions or sub-grid modeling for parallel current evolution.
Scientific codes are an indispensable link between theory and experiment; in (astro-)plasma physics, such numerical tools are one window into the universe's most extreme flows of energy. The discretization of Maxwell's equations - needed to make highly magnetized (astro)physical plasma amenable to its numerical modeling - introduces numerical diffusion. It acts as a source of dissipation independent of the system's physical constituents. Understanding the numerical diffusion of scientific codes is the key to classifying their reliability. It gives specific limits in which the results of numerical experiments are physical. We aim at quantifying and characterizing the numerical diffusion properties of our recently developed numerical tool for the simulation of general relativistic force-free electrodynamics by calibrating and comparing it with other strategies found in the literature. Our code correctly models smooth waves of highly magnetized plasma. We evaluate the limits of general relativistic force-free electrodynamics in the context of current sheets and tearing mode instabilities. We identify that the current parallel to the magnetic field (j(parallel to)), in combination with the breakdown of general relativistic force-free electrodynamics across current sheets, impairs the physical modeling of resistive instabilities. We find that at least eight numerical cells per characteristic size of interest (e.g., the wavelength in plasma waves or the transverse width of a current sheet) are needed to find consistency between resistivity of numerical and of physical origins. High-order discretization of the force-free current allows us to provide almost ideal orders of convergence for (smooth) plasma wave dynamics. The physical modeling of resistive layers requires suitable current prescriptions or a sub-grid modeling for the evolution of j(parallel to).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available