4.6 Article

The Hubble Space Telescope UV Legacy Survey of Galactic Globular Clusters: XXII. Relative ages of multiple populations in five globular clusters

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 646, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039441

Keywords

techniques: photometric; stars: Population II; globular clusters: general

Funding

  1. French Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a new technique to estimate the relative ages of multiple stellar populations in five globular clusters. By creating color-magnitude and two-color diagrams of the clusters and identifying different populations within them, the study was able to accurately estimate the relative ages between the first generation and successive generations of stars. The results show that some clusters have coeval populations within specific time frames.
Aims. We present a new technique to estimate the relative ages of multiple stellar populations hosted by the following five globular clusters: NGC 104 (47 Tuc), NGC 6121 (M 4), NGC 6352, NGC 6362, and NGC 6723. Methods. We used the catalogs of the database HST UV Globular Cluster Survey to create color-magnitude and two-color diagrams of the globular clusters. We identified the multiple populations within each globular cluster, and we divided these into two main stellar populations: POPa, or first generation; and POPb, which is composed of all the successive generations of stars. This new technique allows us to obtain an accurate estimate of the relative ages between POPa and POPb. Results. The multiple populations of NGC 104 and NGC 6121 are coeval within 220 Myr and 214 Myr, while those of NGC 6352, NGC 6362, and NGC 6723 are coeval within 336 Myr, 474 Myr, and 634 Myr, respectively. These results were obtained combining all the sources of uncertainties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available