4.6 Article

Age dissection of the Milky Way discs: Red giants in the Kepler field

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 645, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038307

Keywords

Galaxy: evolution; Galaxy: stellar content; Galaxy: structure; stars: late-type; stars: mass-loss; asteroseismology

Funding

  1. ERC Consolidator Grant [772293]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [804752]
  3. Center for Cosmology and AstroParticle Physics at The Ohio State University
  4. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  5. International Space Science Institute (ISSI)
  6. FCT/MCTES
  7. FEDER through COMPETE2020 [UID/FIS/04434/2019, PTDC/FIS-AST/30389/2017, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-030389]
  8. ARC [FT160100402]
  9. ARC Centre of Excellence ASTRO 3D [CE170100013]
  10. Australian Research Council [FT190100574]
  11. DFG [CH1188/2-1]
  12. ChETEC COST Action - COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [CA16117]
  13. NASA Science Mission directorate
  14. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  15. US Department of Energy Office of Science
  16. Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah
  17. Brazilian Participation Group
  18. Carnegie Institution for Science
  19. Carnegie Mellon University
  20. Chilean Participation Group
  21. French Participation Group
  22. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  23. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  24. The Johns Hopkins University
  25. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU)/University of Tokyo
  26. Korean Participation Group
  27. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  28. Leibniz Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)
  29. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg)
  30. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik (MPA Garching)
  31. MaxPlanck-Institut fur Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE)
  32. National Astronomical Observatories of China
  33. New Mexico State University
  34. New York University
  35. University of Notre Dame
  36. Observatorio Nacional/MCTI
  37. The Ohio State University
  38. Pennsylvania State University
  39. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
  40. United Kingdom Participation Group
  41. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  42. University of Arizona
  43. University of Colorado Boulder
  44. University of Oxford
  45. University of Portsmouth
  46. University of Utah
  47. University of Virginia
  48. University of Washington
  49. University of Wisconsin
  50. Vanderbilt University
  51. Yale University
  52. Australian Research Council [FT190100574] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
  53. STFC [ST/S000216/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ensemble studies of red-giant stars with precise seismic, spectroscopic, and astrometric constraints provide a new opportunity to address long-standing questions about stellar evolution and galaxy formation. The research reveals robust patterns in mass, age, chemical abundance, and orbital parameters, despite potential systematic uncertainties. The findings suggest efficient radial migration in the thin disc and confirm different chemo-dynamical histories of the chemical-thick and thin discs.
Ensemble studies of red-giant stars with exquisite asteroseismic (Kepler), spectroscopic (APOGEE), and astrometric (Gaia) constraints offer a novel opportunity to recast and address long-standing questions concerning the evolution of stars and of the Galaxy. Here, we infer masses and ages for nearly 5400 giants with available Kepler light curves and APOGEE spectra using the code PARAM, and discuss some of the systematics that may affect the accuracy of the inferred stellar properties. We then present patterns in mass, evolutionary state, age, chemical abundance, and orbital parameters that we deem robust against the systematic uncertainties explored. First, we look at age-chemical-abundances ([Fe/H] and [alpha /Fe]) relations. We find a dearth of young, metal-rich ([Fe/H] > 0.2) stars, and the existence of a significant population of old (8-9 Gyr), low-[alpha /Fe], super-solar metallicity stars, reminiscent of the age and metallicity of the well-studied open cluster NGC 6791. The age-chemo-kinematic properties of these stars indicate that efficient radial migration happens in the thin disc. We find that ages and masses of the nearly 400 alpha -element-rich red-giant-branch (RGB) stars in our sample are compatible with those of an old (similar to 11 Gyr), nearly coeval, chemical-thick disc population. Using a statistical model, we show that the width of the observed age distribution is dominated by the random uncertainties on age, and that the spread of the inferred intrinsic age distribution is such that 95% of the population was born within similar to 1.5 Gyr. Moreover, we find a difference in the vertical velocity dispersion between low- and high-[alpha /Fe] populations. This discontinuity, together with the chemical one in the [alpha /Fe] versus [Fe/H] diagram, and with the inferred age distributions, not only confirms the different chemo-dynamical histories of the chemical-thick and thin discs, but it is also suggestive of a halt in the star formation (quenching) after the formation of the chemical-thick disc. We then exploit the almost coeval alpha -rich population to gain insight into processes that may have altered the mass of a star along its evolution, which are key to improving the mapping of the current, observed, stellar mass to the initial mass and thus to the age. Comparing the mass distribution of stars on the lower RGB (R< 11 R-circle dot) with those in the red clump (RC), we find evidence for a mean integrated RGB mass loss Delta M = 0.10 +/- 0.02 M-circle dot. Finally, we find that the occurrence of massive (M greater than or similar to 1.1 M-circle dot) alpha -rich stars is of the order of 5% on the RGB, and significantly higher in the RC, supporting the scenario in which most of these stars had undergone an interaction with a companion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available