4.5 Article

Probiotic effects (Bacillus cereus and Bacillus subtilis) on growth and physiological parameters of silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen)

Journal

AQUACULTURE NUTRITION
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 454-467

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/anu.13198

Keywords

biotechnology; fish farming; immunomodulatory; native species; non‐ pathogenic bacteria

Categories

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated that adding 0.60 g/kg of probiotics to diets for Rhamdia quelen enhances its growth performance and physiological status. However, adding 0.30 g/kg may have detrimental effects on certain physiological parameters.
This study aimed at evaluating the effects of a probiotic additive in productive performance and physiological parameters for Rhamdia quelen. The fish were fed diets containing increasing levels of the additive (0.15; 0.30; 0.45; and 0.60 g/kg of feed), which consisted of a blend of Bacillus cereus and B. subtilis, both at the concentration of 4 x 10(11) CFU). Productive performance parameters were higher in fish fed diets containing 0.60 g/kg of the probiotics. Both the proximate composition and carcass yield were affected when 0.30 and 0.60 g/kg of the additive was included, whilst serum biochemical parameters were higher in fish fed diets containing 0.60 g/kg of the additive. An increase in the hepatic oxidative stress activity was found when 0.30 g/kg was supplied. The development of intestinal villi was influenced by the inclusion of the additives, as well as the activity of mucous-secreting cells in the tissue. Hepatocyte's growth was differential in fish fed diets containing 0.30 g/kg and other tissue alterations were found using 0.60 g/kg of the additive. The inclusion of 0.60 g/kg of the probiotic in diets for R. quelen enhances its growth performance and physiological status.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available