4.5 Article

Evaluation of body weight and color of cultured European catfish (Silurus glanis) and African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) using image analysis

Journal

AQUACULTURAL ENGINEERING
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2021.102147

Keywords

Catfish; Image analysis; Length; Weight; Color

Funding

  1. Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Akdeniz University [FBA-2019-4466]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Image analysis was used to evaluate weight estimation and colors of European catfish and African catfish. Different equations were used to determine the relationships between weight and length/view area, showing slight differences between the two fish species. The average color values showed no significant difference between the two species.
Two cultured catfish species (European catfish Silurus glanis, and African catfish Clarias gariepinus) were evaluated for their weight estimation and colors by image analysis. A total of 60 whole fish from each species were first weighed, and then their pictures taken by a digital camera in a light box. Length, weight and color of all fish were determined by image analysis and results were compared between the two fish. Fish weight ranged from 7.4 to 39.61 g and 25.71 to 93.91 g for European and African catfish, respectively. Weight (W) vs length (L) data were fitted linear (W = A + BL), power (W = A LB) and second order polynomial equations (W = C0 + C1 L + C2 L2). The R2 values ranged from 0.835 to 0.974. For the W vs view area (V) relationship, the same equations were used. The R2 values for these equations ranged from 0.927 to 0.972. No significant difference was found between the average color values according to the L*, a* and b* distributions for both fish species (P > .05). Image analysis can easily determine length, view area, and color of fish and help in developing W vs L, and W vs V relationships.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available