4.7 Article

Thermodynamic analysis of a parallel type organic Rankine cycle and ejector heat pump combined cycle

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116061

Keywords

Combined cycle; Organic Rankine cycle; Ejector heat pump; Thermodynamic analysis; Working fluid flow ratio

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [ZZSB-2019-35]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper proposes a parallel type organic Rankine cycle and ejector heat pump combined cycle with an external heat exchanger, which can adjust the thermoelectric ratio to enhance energy recovery capacity and efficiency.
A parallel type organic Rankine cycle and ejector heat pump combined cycle with an external heat exchanger is proposed in this paper. The proposed system can recover all the condensing heat for the production of radiant heating water. And the system can adjust the thermoelectric ratio according to the actual needs of users by arranging the expander and the ejector in parallel. Energy analysis and exergy analysis mathematical models of the combined cycle are constructed. The thermal performance of the combined cycle is studied through parameter analysis and exergy analysis. The results show that heat recovery capacity, net power output, and exergy efficiency of the combined cycle are 60.83%, 4.62%, and 30.76% higher than the basic organic Rankine cycle, respectively. The component with the largest exergy destruction is the generator (85.07 kW). Reducing the working fluid ratio can increase the net power output efficiency and exergy efficiency of the combined cycle. And the applicable range of the working fluid flow ratio increases as the evaporating temperature decreases. The combined cycle has advantages in thermal performance and matching comprehensive energy demand.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available