4.7 Article

Determination of sp2 and sp3 phase fractions on the surface of diamond films from C1s, valence band X-ray photoelectron spectra and CKVV X-ray-excited Auger spectra

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 536, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147807

Keywords

Ultrananocrystalline diamond films; XPS; C1s spectra; Carbon KVV spectra; Valence band spectra; sp(2) and sp(3) hybridization states

Funding

  1. Southern Federal University (Internal grant of SFU) [VnGr-07/2020-01-IF]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study analyzed the method of determining the relative contents of carbon atoms in sp(2) and sp(3) states using C1s X-ray photoelectron and CKVV spectra, as well as the difficulties associated with this approach. A new method for evaluating the fractions of sp(2) and sp(3) phases was proposed, and differences in analyzing the surface characteristics of ultrananocrystalline and microcrystalline diamond films were compared.
The practice of applying the methods for determining the relative contents of carbon atoms in sp(2) and sp(3) hybridization states from the profiles of C1s X-ray photoelectron and carbon KVV (CKVV) Auger spectra is analyzed. Difficulties in using C1s and CKVV spectra for determining the sp(2)/sp(3) ratios are discussed. A method is proposed for evaluating the fractions of sp(2) and sp(3) phases based on the fitting of the valence band X-ray photoelectron spectra by superposition of valence band spectra of samples with carbon atoms in pure sp(2) and sp(3) states. Relative fractions of sp(2) and sp(3) phases on the virgin surfaces of two ultrananocrystalline diamond films, and on their surfaces subjected to friction, were determined using C1s spectra, CKVV Auger spectra, and valence band spectra. All three methods gave the results that are consistent for virgin film surfaces with accuracy of 2%, and for the surfaces of films subjected to friction, 15%. In contrast to the ultrananocrystalline films, three XPSbased methods applied to a microcrystalline diamond film yielded significantly different sp(2)/sp(3) ratios. The reasons for this discrepancy are shown to lie in different analysis depths of these methods, and in different morphology of the film surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available