4.6 Article

Optical constants from scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscope

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0036872

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council's Discovery Projects' funding scheme [DP200101948]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP200101948] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM) allows for characterization of optical properties at nanoscale below the diffraction limit, with a new calibration method proposed for extracting optical constants without prior knowledge of probe geometry. The technique's accuracy is comparable to traditional far-field methods and provides spatial distribution of optical constants at nanoscale, making it applicable for s-SNOM measurements in other spectral ranges.
Scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM) allows for the characterization of optical properties of samples at the nanoscale, well below the diffraction limit of the interrogating wavelength. Typically, it relies on a model for the probe-sample interaction to extract complex optical constants of the sample. Here, we propose an s-SNOM calibration method that allows for the extraction of these constants without prior knowledge of the probe geometry nor the details of the probe-sample interactions. We illustrate the technique using terahertz time-domain spectroscopy-based s-SNOM to extract the optical properties of several organic and inorganic materials and differently doped regions of a standard silicon random access memory sample. The accuracy of the technique is comparable to that of conventional far-field techniques while additionally providing spatial distribution of optical constants at the nanoscale. The source-independent nature of the proposed technique makes it directly applicable for s-SNOM measurements in other spectral ranges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available