4.8 Article

Energetic, economic, and environmental assessment of a Stirling engine based gasification CCHP system

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 281, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116067

Keywords

Biomass gasification; Stirling engine; CCHP; Food waste; 3E analysis

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF), Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme [R-706-001-102-281]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a Stirling engine based gasification combined cooling, heat and power system, which can mitigate tar condensation and contamination, and analyzes the gasification process. In Singapore and Shanghai, the system saves a significant amount of cost and has advantages over internal combustion engine systems in terms of levelized total cost and primary energy saving ratio.
Due to the tar contamination caused by the gasification process of biomass, the internal combustion engine (ICE) based gasification cogeneration systems require complicated gas cleaning devices to purify producer gas. In this paper, a Stirling engine based gasification combined cooling, heat and power (CCHP) system was introduced, which has the capability of mitigating tar condensation and contamination. The gasification CCHP system, including the gasification system, the Stirling engine system, and the absorption chiller system, can provide electricity, heat and cooling for a commercial building. The effects of the equivalence ratio on syngas composition and cold gas efficiency of the gasification process were analyzed herein. The optimal systems in Singapore and Shanghai can save respectively 75.9% and 70.5% levelized total cost compared to a conventional reference system. The Stirling engine based CCHP system had advantages over the ICE systems on overall consideration of the levelized total cost and the primary energy saving ratio. The monthly energetic, economic and environmental performance of the CCHP systems was evaluated under different modes and the above two systems' primary energy saving ratios, operation cost reduction ratios and CO2 equivalent reduction ratios respectively reached 0.886, 0.462 and 0.701 in Singapore and 0.908, 0.535 and 0.710 in Shanghai in annual operation. The outcomes of this paper contribute to the design and deployment of such a CCHP system, and the developed models and analysis framework can be extended to different climate areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available