4.8 Article

Multi-objective approach to the optimization of shape and envelope in building energy design

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 280, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115984

Keywords

Building geometry; Shape coefficient; nZEB; BEO; Genetic algorithm; Multi-objective optimization

Funding

  1. Sapienza University of Rome from the Progetti di Ricerca - Progetti Medi 2018 grant [RM1181641CF24D41]
  2. Ermenegildo Zegna

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In accordance with national and international regulations, the energy usage and emissions of buildings need to be reduced. Both new constructions and retrofit actions should consider the strict requirements of a more sustainable built environment. In many cases, passive and active strategies are only added to the project after an initial conceptual design of the building has already been drawn up, thus limiting their effective integration into the construction as well as their efficacy. Moreover, the complexity linked to different and often contrasting objectives calls for a multi-objective optimization of the process that simultaneously considers energy and emissions in addition to costs. Given the above-mentioned challenges, we propose a novel approach to the multi objective optimization of new buildings and retrofit actions that considers geometry and envelopes variables, allowing for architectural variability. We demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method by means of its application to a case study building that is located in the Mediterranean climate and is already compliant with current regulations. The proposed multi-objective optimization approach, based on a genetic algorithm and conducted by means of open access software, made it possible to save 60% of the annual energy demand by means of geometry optimization and, once the geometry was fixed, 23% of the annual energy cost by means of passive and active strategies, while reducing the energy simulations required from 3 x 10(12) to less than 8000.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available