4.8 Article

Characterization of none and yttrium-modified Ni-based catalysts for dry reforming of methane

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 278, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119335

Keywords

Nickel catalysts; Y-modi fied alumina; Dry reforming of methane; Characterization

Funding

  1. Bulgarian National Science Fund [DH09//5/2016]
  2. Center of competence HITMOBIL - Technologies and systems for generation, storage and consumption of clean energy by Operational Programme Science.nd Education For Smart Growth 2014-2020 [BG05M20P001-1.002-0014]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [CTQ2016-76505-C3-1]
  4. EU from European Regional Development Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monometallic and bimetallic RhNi catalysts supported on gamma-alumina and yttria-modified alumina were developed. The relation between the support kind, the structure and catalytic properties of the catalysts in dry reforming of methane was studied by using different techniques such as: N-2 isotherms, UV-vis DRS, XRD, TPDNH3, TPR-H-2, XPS and HRTEM. Variation in the electronic environment of the nickel, rhodium and yttrium atoms as a function of the catalyst pretreatment and support kind was observed. It was shown that the couple pairs of Ni-o/Nin+ and/or Rh-o/Rhn+ act as active sites. The difference in the catalytic behaviors of catalysts was connected with the distribution of metal particles. Y-loaded monometallic Ni catalyst showed higher activity and stability than alumina supported Ni due to the proximity of nickel to yttrium oxide species expressed by the increase of metal dispersity. The close contact between Rh and Ni leaded to better catalytic behavior of bimetallic RhNi/Al catalyst due to the better reducibility of nickel oxide species and homogeneous distribution of the particles with average diameter size of similar to 5 nm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available