4.7 Article

Low-frequency sound absorption of a metamaterial with symmetrical-coiled-up spaces

Journal

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
Volume 172, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107593

Keywords

Low-frequency sound absorption; Acoustic metamaterial; Subwavelength absorber; Symmetrical labyrinth

Categories

Funding

  1. Graduate Program in Mechanical Engineering (POSMEC) of the Federal University of Santa Catarina
  2. Laboratory of Vibrations and Acoustics (LVA) of the Federal University of Santa Catarina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a theoretical, numerical, and experimental investigation of a low-frequency acoustic absorber. By improving the acoustic metamaterial design, the absorber achieved a sound absorption efficiency of over 91% in the desired frequency range. The experimental results are in agreement with the theoretical model, validating the design approach for the new absorber.
A theoretical, numerical and experimental investigation of a low-frequency acoustic absorber (100-600 Hz) is reported herein. The acoustic metamaterial is based on a micro-perforated panel coupled to a multi-cavity of coiled-up spaces that is similar to a symmetrical labyrinth. On considering the visco-thermal losses, the effect of increasing the number of symmetrically coiled-up spaces that determines the peak position of the sound absorption and allows a greater sound energy absorption is discussed theoretically and proven through numerical analysis (FEM). Prototypes were manufactured using 3D printing technology and evaluated in an impedance tube. The results for the sound absorption coefficient acquired in the desired frequency range were greater than 91% with relative bandwidth above 35%, in agreement with the analytical model. Therefore, it is demonstrated that the proposed absorber presents a scale of deep-subwavelength since its total thickness is 0.033 lambda. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available