4.6 Article

Multimodal Prehabilitation for Lung Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 112, Issue 5, Pages 1600-1608

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.11.022

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Perioperative Program Charitable Foundation, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  2. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec - Sante
  3. McGill University Health Centre Research Institute
  4. Mitacs (Accelerate Fellowship Program)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For patients undergoing lung cancer resection within an enhanced recovery pathway, a multimodal prehabilitation program initiated 4 weeks before operation is as effective in recovering functional capacity as multimodal rehabilitation.
Background. The study was conducted to determine whether a multimodal prehabilitation program enhances postoperative functional recovery compared with multimodal rehabilitation. Methods. Patients scheduled for non-small cell lung cancer resection were randomized to 2 groups receiving home-based moderate-intensity exercise, nutritional counseling with whey protein supplementation, and anxiety-reducing strategies for 4 weeks before the operation (PREHAB, n = 52) or 8 weeks after (REHAB, n = 43). Functional capacity (FC) was measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at baseline, immediately before the operation, and 4 and 8 weeks after operation. All patients were treated according to enhanced recovery pathway guidelines. Results. There was no difference in FC at any point during the perioperative period between the 2 multimodal programs. By 8 weeks after operation, both groups returned to baseline FC, and a similar proportion of patients (>75%) in both groups had recovered to their baseline. Conclusions. In patients undergoing surgical resection for lung cancer within the context of an enhanced recovery pathway, multimodal prehabilitation initiated 4 weeks before operation is as effective in recovering FC as multimodal rehabilitation. (C) 2021 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available