4.8 Article

Formic Acid Electro-Synthesis by Concurrent Cathodic CO2 Reduction and Anodic CH3OH Oxidation

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages 3148-3155

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202012066

Keywords

CO2 reduction; concurrent formic-acid production; electrocatalysis; methanol oxidation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702099]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020T130193]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a strategy for efficient formic acid synthesis by conducting concurrent cathodic CO2 reduction and anodic partial methanol oxidation reactions, resulting in significantly lowered potential and high Faraday efficiency in CO2 reduction.
The electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide into energy-carrying compounds or value-added chemicals is of great significance for diminishing the greenhouse effect and the efficient utilization of carbon-dioxide emissions, but it suffers from the kinetically sluggish anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and its less value-added production of O-2. We report a general strategy for efficient formic-acid synthesis by a concurrent cathodic CO2 reduction and anodic partial methanol-oxidation reaction (MOR) using mesoporous SnO2 grown on carbon cloth (mSnO(2)/CC) and CuO nanosheets grown on copper foam (CuONS/CF) as cathodic and anodic catalysts, respectively. Anodic CuONS/CF enables an extremely lowered potential of 1.47 V vs. RHE (100 mA cm(-2)), featuring a significantly enhanced electro-activity in comparison to the OER. The cathodic mSnO(2)/CC shows a rather high Faraday efficiency of 81 % at 0.7 V vs. RHE for formic-acid production from CO2. The established electrolyzer equipped with CuONS/CF at the anode and mSnO(2)/CC at the cathode requires a considerably low cell voltage of 0.93 V at 10 mA cm(-2) for formic-acid production at both sides.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available