4.8 Article

Mixed Noble-Gas Compounds of Krypton(II) and Xenon(VI); [F5Xe(FKrF)AsF6] and [F5Xe(FKrF)2AsF6]

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 60, Issue 15, Pages 8149-8156

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202014682

Keywords

fluorine chemistry; hypervalent compounds; krypton and xenon compounds; Raman spectroscopy; X-ray crystallography

Funding

  1. Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Slovenian Research Agency [P1-0045]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The coordination chemistry of KrF2 is limited compared to XeF2, but in this study, new mixed krypton/xenon compounds were synthesized where KrF2 acts as a ligand coordinating to xenon atoms. This extends the XeF2-KrF2 analogy and introduces a new class of coordination compound.
The coordination chemistry of KrF2 has been limited in contrast with that of XeF2, which exhibits a far richer coordination chemistry with main-group and transition-metal cations. In the present work, reactions of [XeF5][AsF6] with KrF2 in anhydrous HF solvent afforded [F5Xe(FKrF)AsF6] and [F5Xe(FKrF)(2)AsF6], the first mixed krypton/xenon compounds. X-ray crystal structures and Raman spectra show the KrF2 ligands and [AsF6](-) anions are F-coordinated to the xenon atoms of the [XeF5](+) cations. Quantum-chemical calculations are consistent with essentially noncovalent ligand-xenon bonds that may be described in terms of sigma-hole bonding. These complexes significantly extend the XeF2-KrF2 analogy and the limited chemistry of krypton by introducing a new class of coordination compound in which KrF2 functions as a ligand that coordinates to xenon(VI). The HF solvates, [F5Xe(FH)AsF6] and [F5Xe(FH)SbF6], are also characterized in this study and they provide rare examples of HF coordinated to xenon(VI).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available