4.8 Article

Interaction with Ribosomal Proteins Accompanies Stress Induction of the Anticancer Metallodrug BOLD-100/KP1339 in the Endoplasmic Reticulum

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 60, Issue 10, Pages 5063-5068

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202015962

Keywords

bioinorganic chemistry; metals in medicine; multi-omics; ribosome; ruthenium

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P33238-N]
  2. FWF [P27749]
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P33238, P27749] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that the anticancer agent BOLD-100 interacts with ribosomal proteins, induces ER stress, and modulates GRP78 in cancer cells. Target-profiling experiments and cellular observations provide evidence for these changes.
The ruthenium-based anticancer agent BOLD-100/KP1339 has shown promising results in several in vitro and in vivo tumour models as well as in early clinical trials. However, its mode of action remains to be fully elucidated. Recent evidence identified stress induction in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and concomitant down-modulation of HSPA5 (GRP78) as key drug effects. By exploiting the naturally formed adduct between BOLD-100 and human serum albumin as an immobilization strategy, we were able to perform target-profiling experiments that revealed the ribosomal proteins RPL10, RPL24, and the transcription factor GTF2I as potential interactors of this ruthenium(III) anticancer agent. Integrating these findings with proteomic profiling and transcriptomic experiments supported ribosomal disturbance and concomitant induction of ER stress. The formation of polyribosomes and ER swelling of treated cancer cells revealed by TEM validated this finding. Thus, the direct interaction of BOLD-100 with ribosomal proteins seems to accompany ER stress-induction and modulation of GRP78 in cancer cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available